Alrighty then.......This is my first blog on this site,so please bear with me.
I am a photographer and I shoot primarily land/seascapes as well as nature. I have entered and been accepted to a few juried Art Fairs in the past few years. I don't do many and most all of them are within about 100 mile drive.
I enjoy them and love the intereaction with customers and other artists.
My question is.........When a judge (or judges) view your booth,what exactly are they looking at (for)and what or how is it determined who gets a ribbon? Is it based soley on your work, or other elements? Do they use a point system? Is interacting and conversing with the judge(s) a good or bad thing?
The most recent fair I participated in last weekend had about 70+ 2-D entries and one judge for that category.
Just a newbie question I guess,but one that I am curious about.
Comments
I appreciate it when I can actually see a judge enter my booth. At several shows they simply don't appear. That being said, I also appreciate judges who stop, take a minute, and actually look at what I do, rather than perform a brief panoramic scan of my booth. I try to introduce myself and explain my art. Because I am a silk painter, the various techniques that I use are not always readily apparent and an explanation (albeit brief) has proved to be very helpful.
Thank you all! I appreciate all the great input. The Judge I had at my last fair questioned one of my photos (panoramic shot) as to whether it was shot with a panoramic camera, or stitched together. It was stitched. I think he would have preferred the former,but it is what it is.
My work is pretty straight forward landscapes,not much photoshopping,so they either appeal to the Judges or they don't. I guess the bottom line is that I sold a lot and had a lot of awesome comments from customers :)
I would have said unusual subject matter done very well and marketed toward the higher end buyer. I have always had different work but have marketed to the masses, which is why I never win awards. Except for a show I did this year where we had to submit a piece for jurying. Then my marketing didn't influence the jurors.
Larry Berman
http://BermanGraphics.com
412-401-8100
Great insights here, especially Mary's comment on the work "damaged in transit." It's almost impossible to avoid small nicks on an image, here or there...and I'll often offer a customer a discount on such work. But I avoid hanging it until the jurors have completed their work.
I'm always amused by judges that attempt to remain incognito. I like it when they introduce themselves. But if they don't and I crack their disguise, I'll briefly introduce myself, make a one sentence statement--the best statement is one that proactively provides an insight into my work or approach--and then step back.
I really appreciate it when jurors take a few moments to ask questions. But I've never been successful at figuring out, based on the questions asked, if I'm going to win an award or not.
As soon as you get the answer, let us all know. Seriously, every judge is different and some (not all) of the award winners work I have looked at I really question what they were thinking. Personal observation is that the majority of them in photography like big, black and white, and don't like canvas.