I need some help deciding where to go with my art in terms of successfully selling, while not completely changing what I am currently doing.
I have read in Maria Arango's Art Festival Guide (which I recommend!) that it is helpful to have some items in a lower price category (maybe $50 - 100?). For me this would mean making much smaller prints, and probably ones that don't have as many layers and detail. Just thinking about that makes me a bit sad.
Another option is to provide cards. Hand printed cards are almost as labor intensive as smaller prints, but as a printmaker I'm reluctant to provide photographic reproductions of my work (at least not in the same display with the originals). People are confused enough about printmaking as an original art form.
I would appreciate any advice, especially from the printmakers out there.
Thanks,
Elizabeth
Replies
Instead of trying to pursue smaller sales, I've been focusing on providing better service and follow up for clients looking for large fomat work and have been very happy with the results.
Thanks for sharing your experience with me about your efforts to create lower price options. I'm encouraged by your experience of focussing on your clients and promoting your larger works.
Thanks for your insights!
Elizabeth
The answer to your question falls into the subjective category and is driven by the pressure of trying to drive more income. From painful experience I feel qualified to comment - remember, subjective. My background: 30 years as commercial photographer, 15 year ad agency owner-turned VP Marketing, now back to semi-retired "artist" looking at this art fair market as an outlet for the passion that got me started and income to support retirement.
My similar experience comes from waiting too long to transition from film to digital, just before a massive regional industry decline destroyed my entire commercial client base which destroyed my financial ability to spend another $30,000 on replacing/upgrading large format film to digital. Now, going from large format film for commercial work at $1,200/day plus expenses (not a NYC market) to 35mm digital just makes me sad. The answer, for me, was to work within the limitations and best use of the format and equipment which, in this case, means editorial/slice of life work that I did 30 years previously. Shooting 35mm of cars in a studio setting for annual reports simply doesn't cut it - not for me at least.
I use that only as a comparison for your situation and you comment "just makes me sad" screams volumes about your response if forced into something for which you have no passion. It will show in the work. Diamonds have no less value because of their size.
My opinion is that educating the buyer is key here. Use "original vs reproduction" as your price point difference, not size. And explain the difference very clearly to potential buyers. Having pro quality reproductions made gives you the price point difference and allows you to use size to price accordingly. Keep the originals and price them for discriminating buyers (without insulting the others.) Use the reproduction files for postcards for both sale on a rack and as marketing tools. As I said, a subjective opinion.
Thanks!
Elizabeth